Not a Legacy of Slavery

This week as the 50th Anniversary of Martin Luther King’s famous “I have a dream” speech is celebrated; there are a number of things not widely known.

For instance, some of the finest buildings in Washington D.C., including the White House and Capitol building were constructed in large part by Blacks, some free, some not — along with immigrants, some free, some not, (indentured servants) who worked side by side without conflict or antipathy. http://www.whitehousehistory.org/whha_timelines/images/whha_timeline-african-american.pdf For names and wages see: http://bobarnebeck.com/slaves.html

One traveler through the South during that era wrote he did not see a single white carpenter, bricklayer, or plasterer, as all skilled trades were performed by Negroes. In the Atlantic Monthly, in case you missed it, Booker T. Washington wrote in November 1889 that, “Under slavery, the Negro was taught every trade, every industry, that furnished the means of earning a living.”

Eight years later in the same magazine, John Stephens Durham cited a 1838 study by The Society of Friends (Quakers) that identified over 45 skilled occupations in Philadelphia in which Blacks were employed. Twenty-one years later an additional 41 trades were added that were not mentioned in the 1838 report. Durham continues, “…today (February 1898) one may safely declare that practically all the trades enumerated by Mr. Bacon (employed by the Quakers) are closed against colored workmen.”

The Labor Unions and the Negro, Atlantic Monthly February 1898. http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pagevieweridx?c=atla;cc=atla;g=moagrp;xc=1;q1=The%20Labor%20Unions%20and%20the%20Negro;rgn=full%20text;idno=atla0081-2;didno=atla0081-2;node=atla0081-2%3A8;view=image;seq=0228

This reminds me of my fourth grade class, the teacher told my friend Johnny to write his name on the chalkboard. He said, “Hey teach, I ain’t got no chalk.” Correcting him the teacher said, “It’s ‘I don’t have any chalk, you don’t have any chalk, he doesn’t have any chalk, she doesn’t have any chalk, they don’t have any chalk!” Little Johnny blurted out, “What the hell happened to all the chalk?”

Today we ask, “What the hell happened to all the jobs that Blacks formerly held with a Black unemployment rate today of 12.6 vs. 6.6% for Whites and nearly 24% for all teenagers. (Pew Research)

The broadest measure of unemployment (U-6) doubles the figures above.
Durham explains what happened. “Union workmen were not satisfied merely to refrain from working when they had declared a strike. They determined to prevent other men from taking the places made vacant… the unions protested against free blacks and foreigners … against any man who could be distinctively marked…. Some of the friends of equality of opportunity for colored workmen have felt impelled to denounce the trade unions.”

Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1913 introduced segregation of Negroes in federal agencies and “the Railway Mail Association, representing the railway mail workers, refused African Americans membership.” http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/AfricanAmericanHistory/p5.html

Unions truly only became powerful when with the support of powerful politicians they were able to exclude non-union workers from jobs. They created an artificial shortage of jobs by reducing competition that gained them above market (free market) wages. Blacks were not allowed to become apprentices or join Unions, except for the Sleeping Car Porters union. The unintended consequences are felt today in high unemployment among all workers and especially among Blacks and teenagers. Teenagers without jobs, up to 40% of Blacks, become restless and often turn to crime and dealing drugs. When I was young,
teenagers worked at gas stations and filled your tank, washed your windows, and checked your oil. Millions of teenagers, including me, delivered the daily newspapers and mowed lawns for their neighbors. Laws, some well-intended, eliminated millions of jobs that paid less than union agitated federal minimum wages.

Perhaps a more detailed explanation of what happened to Black jobs is the Davis-Bacon “Prevailing Wage” Act. This is a federal super-minimum wage law (still with us) that originally was intended to keep Blacks, Hispanics, and immigrants from working on federal construction jobs.

Davis-Bacon requires the payment of prevailing wages on federally funded projects. At the behest of Congress, President Hoover who believed it would prevent wages from falling during the Great Depression signed it into law March 3, 1931. President Roosevelt subsequently concurred.

Regardless of what two Presidents believed, Davis-Bacon was approved by Congress after a contractor using “negro labourers” from the South won a contract to build a Veterans Hospital in New York. Alabama Congressman Clayton Allgood fretted about contractors with “cheap colored labor … of the sort that is in competition with white labor throughout the country.”

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704881304576094221050061598.html

Prevailing wages historically have meant the highest union wages. Non-union construction workers have a tremendous advantage over unionized competitors: They often can do a better job, more efficiently, at less cost to taxpayers. Prevailing Wage laws remove this advantage. Some politicians call this “unfair,” by attacking quality of work while never being able to identify non-union built buildings that are falling down in their districts.

It’s not just wages but also union work rules that cost the taxpayers. Until the 1960s, Walt Richardson, a union painter (and my parents’ business partner) told me the painters union prohibited him using wider than 6 inch paint brushes and he could not use paint rollers or spray guns. Not being subject to such onerous restrictions gave non-union workers a clear edge. I was best man at a friend’s wedding just out of high school when he went to work at National Steel and Shipbuilding. A union steward told Larry to slow down as he was making other workers look bad. Larry said he was just working, not fast, not slow. When he got off work one day all four of his tires were slashed in the parking lot. This was not an uncommon union tactic.

The sole reason for adopting the Prevailing Wage Ordinances is so labor unions will direct their generous campaign contributions to politicians, who vote for such ordinances. All other wondrous explanations are buffalo chips.

If we were in a foreign country this would be illegal under the “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” (15 U.S. C. § 78dd-1, et. Seq.). Unions give campaign contributions to politicians and politicians contribute “taxpayers money” to unions, via union workers getting “prevailing wages.”

Not only are Prevailing Wage Ordinances a throwback to Jim Crow laws keeping Blacks, Hispanics and non-union workers from competing for jobs but when a city’s residents are needlessly forced to pay more for public services they have less money for other necessities relegating them to a lower standard of living.

Undoubtedly, the union workers who get higher so-called “Prevailing Wages” will be grateful. The workers harmed are invisible to elected officials and probably don’t make campaign contributions anyway. It’s as plain as the nose on your face; politicians takes care of those who take care of politicians. “All political power is derived from what you can do to — or for someone.” In summary, based on experience since 1931, those harmed the most are minorities and non-union workers willing to do a better job at lower cost by adopting union prohibited new technology. Regardless of intent of the law, economist Walter Williams writes, “While today’s supporters of the Davis-Bacon Act talk differently, its racially discriminatory effects are the same.”

Other things not widely known are:
1. It was Democrats that put Martin Luther King in the Birmingham Jail.
2. The Ku Klux Klan was indicted by a Grand Jury as the “Terrorist” arm of the Democratic Party responsible for lynching an untold number of Negroes.
3. For 200 years the Democratic Party was the party of racism, slavery and segregation.
4. John F. Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act. 5. Democratic Senators logged the longest filibuster ever to stop the 1964 Civil Right Act.
6. Attorney General Robert Kennedy authorized the bugging of Dr. King’s bed, and the FBI distributed the tapes to King’s wife 7. Bill Moyers distributed copies to the press?
8. Democrats stood in University entryways to block Black Students in the Civil Rights era.
9. Democrats turned fire hoses and attack dogs on peacefully marching Black children
Nonetheless, Martin Luther King was able to rise above it all proving one man of courage makes a majority.

Thomas Sowell notes that more economic progress was made by Blacks in the 20 years prior to the 1964 Civil Rights Act than in the 20 years after the act was passed. Prior to the 1960s, “most black children were raised in two-parent families. At one time, a higher percentage of blacks than whites were married and working.” The evidence to date indicates the reversal in Black social and economic progress is due not to the Legacy of Slavery, as so often heard, but to the Legacy of Unions, Democrats, and Liberalism.

While, admittedly, the Democratic Party of today is not the same as the party of the past.
In spite of Democrats historically stacking the deck against Blacks, Oprah Winfrey and Bill Cosby are two of the richest people in the world along with tens of thousands of Black U.S. millionaires (variously estimated at 35,000 – 109,000). At least one report claims the collective wealth of Black Americans is greater than all of Black Africa. We have a Black President and Black Attorney General, having followed two Black Secretaries of State and have had numerous Black Senators, Congressmen and Mayors. Claims of America as a racist society appear stupid although undoubtedly some residual racism remains in a few places, among a few people.

Booker T. Washington, 100 years ago acknowledged “a class of Blacks that make a living from agitating for Blacks because it pays!” The media seems obsessed with these race-baiters forever shouting “racism.” You can find more at http://www.romancingthevotes.com/ by Fred Schnaubelt or in Former Democrat Delegate, Rev. Wayne Perryman’s “Unfounded Loyalty” and why he filed a class action suit against the Democrat Party for 200 years of oppression. http://www.amazon.com/Unfounded-
Loyalty-In-Depth-Between-Democrats/dp/1562290738 -

Fred Schnaubelt, Former San Diego Councilman Author of Romancing The Voters http://www.romancingthevoters.com

Fred Schnaubelt, a San Diego City Councilman from 1977 – 1981 was San Diego’s first elected official to hire an African-American Chief of Staff, Susan Love Brown; he brought Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams to address the City Council and the Urban League; and he was given credit by Clarence Pendleton for his conversion from Democrat to Republican when “Penny,” as he was called, was introduced to Sowell and Williams and appointed Chairman of the federal Civil Rights Commission.

Sources:

wellfare42minwage
Thomas Sowell argued that the federal minimum wage law has been used to undermine companies that employ blacks. In the fourth quarter of 2012, the black unemployment rate was more than double the rate for whites. But prior to the 1930s, Sowell said, black unemployment was actually lower than white unemployment. “What changed was the government intervention into the labor market,” Sowell said. “1930 was the last year in which there was no federal minimum wage. They brought in the Davis Bacon Act.” Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/16/minimum-wage-responsible-for-black-unemployment-author-says-video/#ixzz2bjcr6FLl
http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/bp017.pdf

Radio Interview with Joe Messina & Fred Schnaubelt

Romancing the Voters

Have you ever been honeyfuggled by a politician? Do they really “buy votes” by making ridiculous promises? Fred Schnaubelt thinks so. And he says the only solution is a constitutionally restrained government. Tune in. Let me know what you think!

Paper Back Edition in Library of Congress LCCN # 2013911214

Romancing The Voters Republican ISBN-10: 1484183630 ISBN-13: 978-1484183632 Title ID: 4226159 ISBN-13: 978-1484183632 http://www.createspace.com/4226159

Romancing The Voters Tea Party Paper Book Romancing The Voter Tea Party ISBN-13: 978-1490317823 ISBN-10: 1490317821  http://www.createspace.com/4305683

Romancing The Voters Tea Party Paper Book Romancing The Voter Tea Party ISBN-13: 978-1490317823 ISBN-10: 1490317821  http://www.createspace.com/4305683 Romancing The Voters Book Formats Epub (Apple iPad/iBooks, Nook, Sony Reader, Kobo, and most e-reading apps including Stanza, Aldiko, Adobe Digital Editions, others)    Kindle (.mobi for Kindle devices and Kindle apps)  LRF (Use only for older model Sony Readers that don’t support .epub) http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/302807

Web Site http://www.romancingthevoters.com/

A New Prevailing Wage Ordinance

FaceBook http://facebook.com/fred.schnaubelt
Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/pub/fred-schnaubelt/8/94b/390

The Black Roots of San Diego’s New Prevailing Wage Ordinance

Not widely known, the White House and Capitol building were constructed in large part by Negroes, some free, some not — along with immigrants who worked side by side without conflict.  http://www.whitehousehistory.org/whha_timelines/images/whha_timeline-african-american.pdf For names and wages see: http://bobarnebeck.com/slaves.html

So it comes as a surprise that 130 years later the Davis-Bacon “Prevailing Wage” Act was adopted. This is a federal super-minimum wage law (still with us) that originally was intended to keep Blacks, Hispanics, and immigrants from working on federal construction jobs.

Davis-Bacon requires the payment of prevailing wages on federally funded projects. At the behest of Congress, President Hoover who believed it would prevent wages from falling during the Great Depression signed it into law March 3, 1931.  President Roosevelt subsequently concurred.

Regardless of what two Presidents believed, Davis-Bacon was approved by Congress after a contractor using “negro labourers” from the South won a contract to build a Veterans Hospital in New York. Alabama Congressman Clayton Allgood fretted about contractors with “cheap colored labor … of the sort that is in competition with white labor throughout the country.”  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704881304576094221050061598.html

A month after Davis-Bacon became federal law San Diego approved a new city charter, which included a section modeled after Davis-Bacon, Section 193 titled: “PREVAILING RATE OF WAGES TO BE PAID ON PUBLIC WORK,” April 7, 1931 (pg 72). Prevailing wages historically have meant the highest union wages.  Non-union construction workers have a tremendous advantage over unionized competitors: They often can do a better job, more efficiently, at less cost to taxpayers. Some politicians call this “unfair,” by attacking quality of work while never being able to identify non-union built buildings that are falling down around the city. Prevailing Wage laws remove this advantage.

It’s not just wages but also union work rules that cost the taxpayers. Until the 1960s union painters were prohibited from using wider than 6 inch paint brushes and could not use paint rollers or spray guns. Not being subject to such onerous restrictions gave non-union workers a clear edge.  I was best man at a friend’s wedding just out of high school when he went to work at National Steel and Shipbuilding.  A union steward told Larry to slow down he was making other workers look bad.  Larry said he was just working, not fast, not slow.  When he got off work one day all four of his tires were slashed in the parking lot.  This was not an uncommon union tactic.

Fast forward to September 1963 when the people of San Diego voted to amend the City Charter and repeal Section 193 which contained the Prevailing Wage clause.

Then, on July 30th, of this year, the City Council at the behest of the Mayor voted 5 to 4 to reinstate a “Prevailing Wage Ordinance. The sole reason for adopting the Prevailing Wage Ordinance for San Diego city projects is so labor unions will direct their generous campaign contributions to the mayor and city council majority who voted for the ordinance.  All other wonderful explanations are buffalo chips.

If San Diego were located in a foreign country this would be illegal under the “Foreign Corrupt Practices Act” (15 U.S. C. § 78dd-1, et. Seq.).  Unions give campaign contributions to council members, and council members contribute “taxpayers money” to unions, via union workers getting “prevailing wages.”

With the renewal of the Prevailing Wage Ordinance this year the city’s Independent Budget Analyst Report concludes on all city projects for FY 2014 the costs could add up to an additional $26 million. (IBA 13-26 p.10) This is the equivalent of five-hundred-twenty (520) $50,000 jobs wiped out by the city council.

While the report estimates the provision will only add 5% to total project costs it’s also acknowledges possible increases of 25% to 37% in the construction portion of total costs. Whatever the actual added cost it’s clear the majority of councilmembers instead of looking out for the taxpayers are looking how to finance their next election with labor union support. It also means $26 million will not be available for fixing the atrocious condition of city streets

Back in 2003 the council had voted to require prevailing wages to be paid on water and sewer construction projects of over $10 million.   Richard Mendes, the city utilities general manager, estimated on just one project it would add $6.9 million to the cost: the planned Miramar sewerage treatment plant. (U-T 4/23/03)

Frank Belock, city engineer, said it would add approximately $25 million to water projects over the next five years (SDDT 7/16/03).  (Now you know why your water bills have been skyrocketing, with high water bills leading to dying lawns and the uglifying of San Diego). A relative handful of union workers will get so-called Prevailing Wages and everyone else will get to pay the increased costs in higher water bills. Walter Williams, commenting on prevailing wages (Davis-Bacon) noted, “Because most black construction workers aren’t union members, the law has the effect of freezing them out of jobs.”

Not only is the city’s Prevailing Wage Ordinance a throwback to Jim Crow laws keeping Blacks, Hispanics and non-union workers from competing for jobs but when city residents are needlessly  forced to pay higher water and sewer bills they have less money for other necessities relegating them to a lower  standard of living.

Undoubtedly, the union workers who will be getting the higher so-called “Prevailing Wage” will be grateful. The workers harmed, much like the minorities under Davis-Bacon and other minimum wage laws are invisible to the council and probably don’t make campaign contributions anyway.  It’s as plain as the nose on your face; the council majority takes care of those who take care of the council and with the cost hidden within all waters bills few residents are expected to notice. How clever! In summary, based on experience since 1931, those harmed the most will be minorities and non-union workers willing to do a better job at lower cost by adopting union prohibited new technology. Regardless of intent of the law, economist Walter Williams writes, “While today’s supporters of the Davis-Bacon Act talk differently, its racially discriminatory effects are the same.”

“Government is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force!

“Government,” as George Washington purportedly said, “is not reason, it is not eloquence — it is force! Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” Government, however, is absolutely indispensable for a free society to work — but it should act as an umpire in enforcing the rules and should not be playing the game.

Think about it, government is the only organization in society with a legal monopoly on force and violence. It is the only organization that obtains its income not by providing goods and services to others in voluntary exchange, but by force, that is, by the direct threat of confiscation or imprisonment if payment is not forthcoming.

This is why the free market economy, private property and limited government (Capitalism) based on voluntary cooperation is the only moral economic system ever devised.http://romancingthevoters.com/